<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THE MOURNING DOVE CAWS &#187; systematic theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themourningdovecaws.com/tag/systematic-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themourningdovecaws.com</link>
	<description>Theology &#124; Bible &#124; Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Church Dogmatics &#8211; I.1 §1: the Task of Dogmatics</title>
		<link>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2011/01/05/church-dogmatics-i-1-%c2%a71-the-task-of-dogmatics/</link>
		<comments>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2011/01/05/church-dogmatics-i-1-%c2%a71-the-task-of-dogmatics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biblical theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church dogmatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogmatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orthodoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prolegomena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themourningdovecaws.com/?p=1230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the get-go one can appreciate the thoughtfulness put into organizing such a large work. Barth begins with definitions and pointed summaries of what follows. He defines dogmatics as, &#8220;the scientific self-examination of the Christian church with respect to the content of its distinctive talk about God&#8221; (3).  As with all starting points and definitions, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2011/01/05/church-dogmatics-i-1-%c2%a71-the-task-of-dogmatics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Primer: The Systemizer vs. the Exegete</title>
		<link>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2010/03/23/primer-the-systemizer-vs-the-exegete/</link>
		<comments>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2010/03/23/primer-the-systemizer-vs-the-exegete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exegesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themourningdovecaws.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big picture.  The fields of theology and biblical studies have for some time now lived in a unique relationship to one another.  Anyone who professes or studies the historic Christian faith must admit the mutual dependency these two fields share. You cannot read the Bible without coming to some conclusion about what its authors [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://themourningdovecaws.com/2010/03/23/primer-the-systemizer-vs-the-exegete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

